Published: Open Education for Safe Generative AI

Published:

Taming the Monster: How can Open Education Promote the Effective and Safe use of Generative AI in Education?

We have converted the question: We should not ask how Generative AI can improve (Open) Education but how (Open) Education can improve Generative AI!

The development, use, and timely promotion of Open Education (OE) has been effective in addressing myriad educational concerns, including inclusivity, accessibility and learning achievement, among many others. However, limited information exists in the literature concerning how OE could enhance Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), which is receiving extensive interest and criticism at this time. To address this research gap, this study relies on the Open Educational Practices (OEP) framework of Huang et al. (2020) to provide various OEP scenarios that could help to promote and facilitate the effective and safe adoption of GenAI in education. The findings of this study could provide guidelines on how relying on OEP when adopting GenAI could help in ensuring quality education which is the sustainable development goal (SDG 4) of the United Nations (UN).

📖 Enjoy reading: https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v11i3.1657

Written together with:

Ahmed Tlili ,Michael Agyemang Adarkwah , Chung Kwan Lo , Aras Bozkurt , Daniel Burgos , Curtis J. Bonk , Eamon Costello , Sanjaya Mishra , and Ronghuai Huang

Invited Speech at European Parliament

I was invited to speak as international expert at the European Parliament and answer questions by the members of the European Parliament on 5th of December 2022. The two-day hearing took place in Paris, France under the leadership of Lord Earl of Dundee. Digital education was one main topic of the agenda for which I was asked to contribute. Together with colleagues from UNESCO and OECD, I was delivering answers on 17 topics that the European Parliament had provided and demanded before.

Overall, I was honoured and pleased to offer my long-term experiences and expertise to the European politicians. My key points and messages were focusing the current and future (digital) education and society:

In the future, face-to-face learning will remain very important. Distance learning will strongly decrease due to the fact that E-Learning will heavily increase thanks to more demands and opportunities, in particular through much more online learning (what is a sub-category of E-Learning).

The strengths and weaknesses of face-to-face and E-Learning (= digital learning) are the same and cannot separated: It always depends on the three main factors: learning objectives, target groups and situation. Only after their definitions the appropriate and best learning type (face-to-face or E-Learning) should be selected.

It is important to differentiate between learning (what can also happen informally without intentions, e. g. on general websites without educational purposes) and education that is always designed with specific learning objectives (and therefore, ‘informal education’ is not existing as it would be a contradiction).

We need to achieve a balance between the commons, the states and private business what is currently dominating, in particular in relation to the educational systems.

First trend: Online courses and learning materials are used more than before (but not that much as we expected from the COVID-19 lockdowns): Unfortunately, we are lacking longitudinal studies and research on online education in general.

Second trend: Open Educational Resources (OER) are a grass-root movement that is rapidly growing thanks to strong UNESCO support and the adopted UNESCO Recommendation on OER (2019), a milestone for future OER development.

Third trend: Open Education is the broad philosophy covering many dimensions and categories for innovating and improving (digital) education including OER).

To analyse the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns and to identify problems and solutions, we, a global group of 40 researchers, have collected and evaluated case studies from 13 countries. Our three research questions were related to: the situation in schools and universities, the usage and effects of Open Education to overcome lockdowns and the introduction of new instruments and tools during lockdowns.

Overall, we could identify 7 key aspects that were the same in (almost) all 13 countries. The specific results concerning the first two research questions are already published in the SSCI journals (Web of Science) Sustainability: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031876 and IRRODL:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i4.6120

My first recommendation for E-Learning is that it requires digital and pedagogical experts and competences. Before designing education and deciding on technologies, you need to address the given situation. Most important future tasks are digital and pedagogical competence building for teachers (and school leaders, pupils and parents) and infrastructure to ensure inclusion, equity and human right of education for all.

I hope that my speech and all provided answer can lead to an improvement of the digital and non-digital education in Europe for our common future and society.

A Milestone: The UNESCO OER Recommendation is adopted!

On 25th of November 2019, the 40th General Conference of UNESCO has adopted the UNESCO OER Recommendation after four years of hard work!

That is a huge and unique milestone for Open Learning and Education that cannot be overestimated in its potential impact! All educators, learning designers, policy makers, public authorities and ministries worldwide are called for action.

It is the first UNESCO Recommendation in the fields of Open Education adopted by consensus. All 193 countries that are member states of UNESCO have the request, task and responsibility to ensure the implementation of the UNESCO OER Recommendation in their educational systems and to provide annual reports about the progress.

I strongly hope and believe that it will be a change agent to open up and improve our future learning and education and to achieve the sustainable Development Goal no.4: inclusive and equitable quality education for all.

The OER definition of the UNESCO OER Recommendation says:

“Open Educational Resources (OER) are learning, teaching and research materials in any format and medium that reside in the public domain or are under copyright that have been released under an open license, that permit no-cost access, re-use, re-purpose, adaptation and redistribution by others.”

And open license is defined as:

“Open license refers to a license that respects the intellectual property rights of the copyright owner and provides permissions granting the public the rights to access, re-use, re-purpose, adapt and redistribute educational materials.”

There are some concerns about these definitions and indeed, the definitions are not easy to read. But they were developed in a truly global and transparent process and have not been changed by UNESCO. And the definitions are not causing problems if they are used and interpreted in a normal way (abuse due to bad intentions or special legal systems cannot be avoided with any definition).

I’m preparing a comprehensive documentation of the history, adoption and ongoing implementation of the UNESCO OER Recommendation HERE.

It will be updated regularly.

To answer the concerns mentioned above, here is the overview of the history and development of the UNESCO OER Recommendation:

2017:

The Second World OER Congress organized by UNESCO took place in Ljubljana on 18th to 20th of September 2017.

2018:

UNESCO published the OER Recommendations in a first version for public consultation (see my submitted comments here on this Open Call for Contributions to collect comments on the OER Recommendations).

2019:

The first draft of the UNESCO OER Recommendation (CL/4273) was published in April 2019 

The final draft of the UNESCO OER Recommendation (CL/4291) was developed in May 2019 and is dated September 2019 : It is the result from the “Intergovernmental Meeting for the Draft Recommendation” that took place in Paris in May 2019. All member states and key NGOS have been invited to attend with official delegations and 150 delegates from 100 countries participated. 

The final UNESCO OER Recommendation (40 C/32) were adopted at the 40th UNESCO General Conference in Paris on 25th of November 2019.

My comments for UNESCO Call on OER Recommendations

As already mentioned in my earlier post, UNESCO has published the OER Recommendations in a first public version.

Attached my comments on the Open Call for Contributions to collect comments on the OER Recommendations by UNESCO that I have submitted today.

In principle, the OER Recommendations are balanced and formulated very well. They are presenting a vision on how OER can improve future education and learning.

What I’m missing are two key points:

First, the focus could be increased by addressing not only OER (as a means and instrument) but Open Education (as a multi-dimensional methodology) in general. As I understood that it is a political question, I have not mentioned it in my submitted somments but I hope that it can be added later.

Second, the importance of quality of OER and Open Education is not highlighted. Therefore I propose to add a sixth objective: “Quality assurance for OER: support and encourage the monitoring, evaluation and improvement of OERs. I hope that it will be included in the final version to underline and strengthen the need and demand for the (appropriate) quality of OERs.

UNESCO’s long-term aim is the approval of the OER Recommendations as official international UN recommendations by the United Nations in the global plenary 2019. That would be a milestone for our global OER movement and Open Education in general!

The OER Recommendations are following up the Second World OER Congress organized by UNESCO in Ljubljana on 18th to 20th of September 2017. And they are based on the Ljubljana OER Action Plan 2017 that were approved during the Second World OER Congress.

 

 

UNESCO OER Recommendations Call

UNESCO OER Recommendations Call

UNESCO has published the OER Recommendations in a first public version.

The long-term aim is the approval as official international UN recommendations by the United Nations in the global plenary 2019. That would be a milestone for our global OER movement and Open Education in general!

The OER Recommendations are following up the Second World OER Congress organized by UNESCO in Ljubljana on 18th to 20th of September 2017. And they are based on the Ljubljana OER Action Plan 2017 that were approved during the Second World OER Congress.

And UNESCO has lauched a Call for Contributions to collect comments on the OER Recommendations. The OER Recommendations are available in English and in French.

Deadline for submissions is on Friday, 1st of June 2018.

Appointment as ICDE Chair in OER

Appointment as ICDE Chair in OER

The International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE) has appointed me as ICDE Chair in Open Educational Resources (OER). This appointment from such a leading international association is a great honour which I am delighted to accept in recognition of my activities and achievements for Open Education. For the past 2 years, I have been working as Associate Professor for Open Education in the Open University’s Welten Institute.

Throughout my career, I have started many successful international projects to open up education and to facilitate and improve the application and impact of Open Education. The main focus of my work is on the quality of Open Education. I set-up and coordinate MOOQ, a European Alliance for the Quality of MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) which aims to foster and improve the quality in Open Learning and Education particularly in MOOCs

Read more